Technical Efficiency of Milkfish Pond Farming Using Traditional and Semi-Intensive Technology in West Jawa

Authors

  • Mahfudlotul Ula Departmen Sosial Ekonomi Pertanian, Fakultas Pertanian, Universitas Brawijaya, Malang, Indonesia
  • Suprehatin Departemen Agribisnis, Fakultas Ekonomi dan Manajemen, IPB University, Bogor, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30736/grouper.v17i1.402

Keywords:

DEA, Milkfish, Technical efficiency , tobit

Abstract

Efforts to increase milkfish production through efficient resource use are very important to study to provide alternatives for farmers in managing a milkfish pond business. It aims to increase production by using existing inputs so as to reduce farming costs and increase farmers' income. Specifically, the objectives of this study are (1) to describe the performance of the milkfish pond cultivation in both traditional and semi-technical production technologies, (2) to analyze the technical efficiency of the milkfish pond cultivation on both production technologies, and (3) identify the factors which affects the technical efficiency of the milkfish pond cultivation. This study used 2013 Agricultural Census data with a total of 1015 respondents of milkfish farmers in West Java Province. Data analysis was performed using descriptive and quantitative analysis. Descriptive statistical analysis was used to describe the characteristics of the respondents' activity, the socio-economic conditions of farmers, the use of production inputs from the milkfish pond cultivation. Quantitative analysis is used to analyze technical efficiency using the Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) approach and to identify socio-economic factors that affect technical efficiency using the Tobit regression. The results showed that the milkfish pond cultivation in West Java Province in general is still cultivated traditionally (56 percent). The results also showed that the technical efficiency value of milkfish farmers with efficient traditional technology was 38 percent of the total farmers who cultivated traditionally with an average technical efficiency value of 0.7, while the milkfish farmers using semi-intensive technology were 22 percent of the 449 farmers. which uses semi-intensive technology with an average technical efficiency value of 0.6. The observed inefficiency may be attributable to suboptimal input allocation, although further analysis is required to establish a causal relationship.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Anam, M. K., & Setyana, S. F. (2026). Analisis Efisiensi Teknis Produksi Rumput Laut (Eucheuma Cottonii) di Kabupaten Situbondo, Jawa Timur Menggunakan Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA). Mimbar Agribisnis: Jurnal Pemikiran Masyarakat Ilmiah Berwawasan Agribisnis, 12(1), 1402-1410.

Anam, M. K., Albab, M. U., Setyana, S. F., & Prihantini, C. I. (2025). Analisis Efisiensi Teknis dan Gap Teknologi pada Produksi Rumput Laut di Jawa Timur Indonesia Menggunakan Metafrontier DEA. Mimbar Agribisnis: Jurnal Pemikiran Masyarakat Ilmiah Berwawasan Agribisnis, 11(1), 717-728.

Anam, M. K. (2021). The Efficiency of Fisheries Processing Industry in Indonesia Using Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA). Agrikan Jurnal Agribisnis Perikanan, 14(2), 704-712.

Anam, M. K., & Suhartini, S. (2020). Efficiency of Palm Oil Companies in Indonesia: A DEA Approach. Habitat, 31(2), 55-63.

Aung, Y. M., Khor, L. Y., Tran, N., Shikuku, K. M., & Zeller, M. (2021). Technical efficiency of small-scale aquaculture in Myanmar: Does women’s participation in decision-making matter? Aquaculture Reports, 21, 100841. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aqrep.2021.100841

Bakhsh K, Ahmad B, Hassan S. 2006. Food Security Through Increasing Technical Efficiency. Asian Journal of Plant Sciences. 5(6): 970-976.

Barus, A. M., Sari, D., & Wulandari, T. (2023). Determinan Efisiensi Teknis Usaha Budidaya Ikan Air Tawar di Indonesia. Jurnal Sosial Ekonomi Perikanan, 18(1), 23–31.

Chiang FS, CH Sun, dan JM Yu. 2004. Technical efficiency analysis of milkfish (Chanos chanos) production in Taiwan-an application of the stochastic frontier production Function. Journal Aquaculture. 230 (1-4):99-116.

Cinemre HA. Ceyhan V, Bozoglu M, Demiryurek K, dan Kilic O. 2006. The cost efficiency of trout farms in the Black Sea Region, Turkey. Journal of Aquaculture. 251(2-4): 324-332.

Coelli TJ, Rao DSP, O’Donnell CJ, Battese GE. 2005. An Introduction to Efficiency and Productivity Analysis Second Edition. New York (US): Springer Science+Business Media, Inc.

Coelli, T. J., Rao, D. S. P., O’Donnell, C. J., & Battese, G. E. (2005). An Introduction to Efficiency and Productivity Analysis. Springer.

FAO [Food and Agriculture Organization].2003. National Aquaculture Sector Overview in Indonesia.

Hakim, L., Suherman, A., & Nurhasanah, I. (2022). Improving Productivity through Technical Efficiency in Fish Farming. Journal of Aquaculture Research and Development, 14(2), 102–112.

Hartanti, N. U., Suyono, S., Cahyani, A., & Dina, K. F. (2024). Peluang ekonomi budidaya udang windu petani tambak kawasan pesisir utara Brebes. Journal of Economics Research and Policy Studies, 4(3), 535–546.

Islam, S., Haider, S., Sayadat, N., & Rahman, S. (2024). Adoption of modern aquaculture technologies in fish farming: The case of rural Bangladesh. World Development Sustainability, 5, 100192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wds.2024.100192.

Islam, S., Mitra, S., & Khan, M. A. (2023). Technical and cost efficiency of pond fish farms: Do young educated farmers bring changes? Journal of Agriculture and Food Research, 12, 100581. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jafr.2023.100581.

Jaya, I. (2026). Kebijakan Strategis Menjadikan Ikan Bandeng sebagai Salah Satu Sumber Protein Pokok Masyarakat Kepulauan Indonesia. Policy Brief Pertanian, Kelautan, dan Biosains Tropika, 8(1).

Kiet Nguyen T dan Fisher Timothy CG. 2011. Efficiency Analysis and the Effect of Pollution on Shrimp Farms in the Mekong River Delta. ISSN: 2185-6168.

Kiet, H. V., et al. (2011). Technical efficiency of aquaculture farms using semi-intensive system. Asian Journal of Agriculture and Development, 8(2), 99–116.

Kusnandar, R., Fitrani, E., & Wahyudi, D. (2021). Analisis efisiensi teknis usaha budidaya udang dengan pendekatan DEA. Jurnal Perikanan Nusantara, 9(2), 45–53.

Kühlmann, K.-J., Focken, U., Coloso, R. M., & Becker, K. (2008). Diurnal feeding pattern and gut content of milkfish Chanos chanos (Forsskål, 1775) cultured semi-intensively during the wet and dry season in brackish ponds in the Philippines. Aquaculture Research, 40(1), 2–12. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2109.2008.02096.x.

[KKP]. Kementerian Kelautan dan Perikanan. 2016. Kelautan dan Perikanan dalam angka 2016.

Nompo, M., Hasanuddin, & Rabi’ah, S. (2024). Optimalisasi Budidaya Udang Windu (Penaeus monodon) Melalui Pendekatan Teknologi dan Manajemen Terpadu di Kecamatan Labakkang Kabupaten Pangkep. Jurnal Riset Diwa Bahari, 2(2), 131–138.

Nagel, B., Buhari, N., & Partelow, S. (2024). Archetypes of community-based pond aquaculture in Indonesia: Applying the social-ecological systems framework to examine sustainability tradeoffs. Environmental Research Letters, 19, 044026. doi:10.1088/1748-9326/ad2e7.

Ula M. 2017. Analisis usaha budidaya tambak bandeng pada teknologi tradisional dan semi-intensif di Kabupaten Karawang. Forum Agribisnis. 7(1): 56-66

Purnomo, A. H., Ridwan, M., & Setiawan, B. (2021). Efisiensi teknis usaha tambak rakyat: Studi kasus di Pantura Jawa. Jurnal Ekonomi Pertanian dan Agribisnis, 5(4), 789–798.

Rahman, M. S., Kazal, M. M. H., Rayhan, S. J., & Manjira, S. (2023). Adoption determinants of improved management practices and productivity in pond polyculture of carp in Bangladesh. Aquaculture and Fisheries, 8(1), 96–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aaf.2021.08.009

Rahman, S., & Sarker, J. R. (2020). Measuring technical efficiency of aquaculture farms in Bangladesh. Aquaculture Reports, 17, 100340.

Riany, C. F., Partelow, S., & Nagel, B. (2023). Governance challenges for Indonesian pond aquaculture: A case study of milkfish production in Gresik. Frontiers in Aquaculture, 2, 1254593. doi: 10.3389/faquc.2023.125459.

Sharma, K. R., & Leung, P. (2000). Technical efficiency of carp production in India: Application of stochastic frontier production function. Aquaculture Economics & Management, 4(3–4), 169–189.

Supadi, I., Yuliana, D., & Mahendra, R. (2021). Efisiensi usaha budidaya lele: Peran pelatihan dan teknologi. Jurnal Agribisnis Indonesia, 9(1), 1–12.

Suharno, Susilowati, I., & Firmansyah. (2017). Management of the traditional milkfish culture in Indonesia: An approach using technical efficiency of the stochastic frontier production. AACL Bioflux, 10(3), 578-586.

Sumagaysay, N. S., Marquez, F. E., & Chiu-Chern, Y. N. (1991). Evaluation of different supplemental feeds for milkfish (Chanos chanos) reared in brackishwater ponds. Aquaculture, 93(2), 177–189. https://doi.org/10.1016/0044-8486(91)90216-T.

Sumagaysay-Chavoso, N. S., & San Diego-McGlone, M. L. (2003). Water quality and holding capacity of intensive and semi-intensive milkfish (Chanos chanos) ponds. Aquaculture, 219(1–4), 413–429. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0044-8486(02)00576-8.

Tarunamulia, & Sammut, J. (2023). An evaluation of the engineering suitability of extensive brackishwater ponds in Barru, South Sulawesi Province, Indonesia. Aquaculture and Fisheries, 8(6), 644–653. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aaf.2022.06.004

Downloads

Published

30-04-2026

How to Cite

Ula, M., & Suprehatin. (2026). Technical Efficiency of Milkfish Pond Farming Using Traditional and Semi-Intensive Technology in West Jawa. Grouper, 17(1), 255–265. https://doi.org/10.30736/grouper.v17i1.402

Similar Articles

<< < 1 2 3 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.